Female characters Essay

The Kite Runner by Khaled Hosseini is a overbold published in 2003 which tells the story of amir, a young Afghanistani male child with a traumatic past, a guilty conscience, a war-stricken homeland and a broken future. The Kite Runner explores troopsy different issues throughout the reinvigorated one such issue is the representation of female persons. Females can be seen as material goods, and be often instaln as marginalized, weak, demeaned, and subject to m any biramous standards in todays alliance, and throughout earlier history.The Kite Runner set ups the psyche of female representation through the develop custodyt and construction of make and female characters, combine with the rankting and finale in the novel. The bringing close together of marginalized female representation is in desire manner shown in otherwise texts such as A Lot to uplift, and juncture, altogether of which used character construction to portray these conceits. The Kite Runner portrays the bringing close together of females as universe marginalized in many different cases. There be only devil females that baffle any backstory or focus in the book The Kite RunnerAmirs wife Soraya, and Sorayas sire.Hassans wife is excessively mentioned briefly. The detail that women are non focused on, and barely mentioned in the novel also show that in Afghan culture, women do not play a large role, they simply blend into the background and do as they are told. Hassans wife, Farzana, is describe as a uncertain cleaning fair sex, courteous, and spoke in a voice only if barely higher than a whisper. It seems that she cooks, cleans, and does some of the basic housework. The situation that she is so shy, polite, and quiet shows how women have been brought up in this culture.Farzana has been brought up to succeed men, and to speak only when spoken to, to be polite and courteous, and to always be virtuous. The only time Farzana stood up for herself, and her family, was when Hassan was shot by the Taliban. She came screaming and attacked them and the Taliban immediately shot her. The fact that the men could so easily and quickly put on a womanhood, who was simply defending her house and family, shows again the way that women whitethorn be seen as almost worthless in the Afghan society. Soraya Taheri, Amirs wife, on the other hand, was the complete opposite of Farzana.When we first gain Soraya, she is fortune forth as a slim-hipped beauty, decent, hardworking and benignant, with a princess-like beauty to her, and she speaks with confidence, which is unlike all of the other Afghan women described in the story. Soraya has a past that she, and e genuinelyone around her, is ashamed of. After arriving in America, Soraya saw the care-free environment, the way that women were accepted, and Soraya realized that maybe she herself could have independence too. Soraya ran absent to Virginia at the age of 18 she was rebellious, she felt that she should b e allowed to be independent.When she returns to her family and moves to California, the rumours spread like wildfire. All of the Afghanis here roughly Sorayas pitch-dark act, and everywhere she goes, whispers follow her. No suitable suitors appear at her doorstep, and no one forgets her mistake. Its so fucking unfair, she says, and it really is. A double standard in this society, where the men can do any(prenominal) they please and no one does a god damn thing, and when a woman does something of the same nature, they are shunned. There is a beautiful amount of burble about Babas wife, who died giving birth to Amir.The Afghan community claimed that Baba would never be able to marry a woman like her she was virtuous, clever, studying at university, and to to pit all off, she was of royal blood. Baba eventually does marry this woman though, and refers to her as his princess. The way that this marriage is described accentuates the idea that men want women the way they would want ma terial goods. The marriages are described almost as if the men are simply picking an object, and cover said object off to the world. Gertrude is seen as unequal to the the almost all-male cast.Gertrude is a female character from Shakespeares famous play critical point. The play is set in Denmark, early 14th century, and tells the story of a young prince, settlement, who gets a visit from his dead fathers ghost, and realizes that not all is dependable in the convey of Denmark. Gertrude is Hamlets buzz off, and the queen of Denmark. After the closing of her husband King Hamlet, Gertrude quickly remarries to the Kings brother Claudius. Hamlet depicts this sudden remarriage as betrayal, unfaithfulness, and the breaking of sacred vows.He feels disgusted that his mother would grieve so little, and move on so fast, and hatred for his mother macrocosms to grow. The play Hamlet has been created so that we, as readers, see Hamlets point of view, nevertheless we do not see the way tha t the other characters theorise. I believe that this sudden remarriage was not simply because Gertrude was seduced, but because Gertrude could not stick her position of power without a male by her side. If we had Gertrudes side of the story, I think we would realize that there were other motives to Gertrudes marriage to Claudius.Gertrude could not run the state of Denmark, or even the castle, without a man in power with her in the time Hamlet was set in, women were often demeaned, and were never seen as equals. To keep the state functioning as a whole, Gertrude realized she would need a new king to rule. Gertrude also may have realized how easy it would be for other man to take advantage if they controlled Gertrude, they could control the state. Her marriage to Claudius at least guaranteed that the state was run by someone she trusted and could see as a ruler.None of these ideas were explicitly stated, because Gertrude was never really given a run across to defend herself and h er actions, due to Hamlet being the focus of the story. Frailty, thy name is woman, Hamlet says, referring to poor Gertrude. He refers to the way that Gertrude was moulded so quickly to anothers will, the way her confidence faltered so soon, and how weak Gertrude really was. Hamlet is a character that has no respect for women. He holds a grievance against his mother, and as the play progresses, these dark feelings that he feels towards his mother grow stronger.Hamlet starts to feel so strongly to his mother betraying him, that he starts to apply this idea to all women, even weak Ophelia. He seems to be under the mold that, though women are frail, weak, and delicate, all women deceive and take part in treachery. He does love Ophelia, but in the end, he feels that Ophelia would betray him, as all women do. He is applying a stereotype to all women, saying that they are will of weak and physical being, and treacherous at heart. Ophelia is also doted on quite a lot by her father and br other.Both men lecture Ophelia about staying virtuous, warning her not to lose her heart, but this is, again, a double standard. Laertes especially is being quite the hypocrite, since he, as a young man, would have been messing around with many young little filles, and not had it held against him since it was socially accepted for men. Polonius also lectures Ophelia to keep her chastity, and talks to her as one would talk to a young child. He depicts Ophelia as being weak, indigent, nothing to a owing(p)er extent than a child, and often gloats to the King Claudius about how dutiful and obedient Ophelia is as a daughter, as if she has no will of her own.He seems to be demean her, without even consciously meaning to, and Ophelia takes no offense to it in that day and age, missys were simply brought up to accept it. The object Ophelia, Hamlet refers to Ophelia at one point. He says this the way he would say the object of his affections. He seems to be referring, yet again, to mat erial goods, to objects, as if Ophelia is simply another prize he can add to his swag cabinet. He also uses a great deal of sexual innuendos when around Ophelia, but neither Ophelia or any other members of the court find it offensive or out of context.He lays his head upon her lap and whispers comments that are obviously making her uncomfortable, but Ophelia never objects, simply because it was normal for women to be taken advantage of. Just like Ophelia being referred to as an object, the short story A Lot to Learn depicts an innocent girl as yet another material good. A Lot to Learn is a story about Ned Quinn, a scientist that has created the Materializer, a large machine that can create anything at the push of a button. The story tells the tale of Ned experimenting with the machine, and wishing for a girl.Before Ned mutters the word girl, he wishes for money, then a martini, then beer. These are two stereotypical goods that a person would probably wish for if he could have anyth ing money and alcohol. When Ned wishes for this girl, after wishing for two in-demand material goods, he seems to be sending a subtle message that perhaps he sees women as nothing more(prenominal) than objects of desire, yet another material good quite of a sentient being. If his experiment was a success, Ned would most likely hold on to this girl the way one would hold onto a trophy a record of his achievements, simply for memories sake.The idea of being nothing more than an object is terribly demeaning, and another show of dominance from males. Women are very subtly discriminated and marginalized in this short story. As well as the idea of the girl being simply an object, Ned seems to be under the impression that this girl would obey him. Before wishing for a girl, Ned did not stop to think that maybe the girl would scream, or run in terror, or bark he simply assumed that the girl that appeared would obey. This is a show of Ned accept that women are weak both physically and m entally.This shows an immediate message about dominance, the way that Ned believes that this girl would do exactly as he wished. He seemed to be under the impression that because he was a man, he is strong, powerful, and has a sense of dignity and respect, therefor meaning that the woman that he pass judgment to appear would simply obey. Ned seems to be very confident in himself and his invention. though he is nervous as he wishes for each new object, he seems to be under the impression that everything will turn out fine. Ned comes across a slight hitch, however, when he mutters the word girl.In our society today, the word girl often refers to woman, not literally a girl or child. Its a misconception, just a word in our culture that has developed to mean something else from the original meaning. Ned obviously does not want the small, innocent child that appears in the machine, as he curses Hell . Referring to a woman as girl is almost demeaning in a way. The fact that Ned wishes fo r a girl as well is slightly disturbing. Upon reading it, most people would immediately assume that Ned wants this girl for nefarious purposes, to fulfil a fantasy or something of that drift.This is another symbol of the female representation being marginalized, shoved aside as the weaker gender. All of these different characters from these three stories easily show the idea of females being marginalized and disenfranchised. Characters such as Ned Quinn, Hamlet, and General Sahib are constructed to be dominant over the female characters. The settings and culture, when combined with these strong male characters, show the many double-standards that exist between females and males, and also show the idea of females being represented as trophy objects.